“My Son Was Judged to be Guilty Before He Ever Stepped One Foot in the Courtroom”: Life Lessons, Revelations & Preventative Awareness from the Mother of a Son Convicted of 1st Degree Pre-meditated Murder.

Thank you for tuning in!  Our global footprint has now reached 111 countries!

On this expanded, investigative episode we shine the antiseptic light of the truth on a 2019 murder case out of the state of Michigan.  The People v Cabrera.

We are honored to sit down with Sarah Cintron, the mother of Juan Cabrera.

Juan was convicted of premeditated intentional murder at the age of 18 by a jury that only took 120 minutes to decide on a charge that mandated him by statute to serve Life in Prison Without the Possibility of Parole (LWOP) for a murder where the actual video evidence in the case did not in any way, shape or form show the face, clothing, nor any single, solitary identifying physical characteristic of the shooter. (View the video that the jury used in its deliberations here for yourself.)

How do you reach a unanimous determination of “beyond a reasonable doubt” with “evidence” such as this?

Material witnesses perjured themselves in statements given to police prior to trial and on the witness stand.  Two material witnesses identified two totally different suspects other than Juan as being the shooter.

Two other key witnesses were given ENORMOUS sentence reductions, ultimately receiving probation on serious other felonies for their “alleged truthful testimony and cooperation” against Juan.

Stemming from the lying and colluding witness statements of party attendees, law enforcement put out a “BOLO” looking for a man named Claudio Estrada Jr., who wasn’t even in the state of Michigan when this crime took place.

One witness was permitted to communicate with other witnesses via Facebook Messenger during her police interview – in front of a female member of the Ottawa County Sheriff’s Department.

Juan’s defense trial attorney (Chris Kessel, now the Michigan assistant attorney general) admitted under oath that he “reviewed the video evidence submitted by the prosecutor but did not conduct a frame-by-frame review of the video”.

When your client is on trial for his life, why not do so?

There were serious questions and concerns about a “conflict of interest” on the part of Juan's attorney, due to the fact that during his trial he took on another extremely high-profile case (the Flint, MI Contaminated Water Cases) working for the same State of Michigan that was trying to put his client away for life.

What do you do when the police immediately suffer from “tunnel vision” and “lock on” to a suspect who they think and believe committed a crime?  When this occurs — it's close to impossible to get them to look at or pursue any other suspects.

States across the nation generally have laws prohibiting people from making false police reports — with our special guest, we ask and examine — the question:

What do you do if the police are the ones furthering the false claims and advancing those claims with shoddy investigatory practices that have produced nothing but lies from liars — from the witness stand and in their sworn affidavits and official reports?

Sarah provides tremendously helpful insight and important awareness as to how you can navigate such choppy waters.

Just after midnight on February 16, 2019, a group of teens gathered at a hotel to celebrate the belated birthday of a mutual friend.

Two of the party attendees have a verbal altercation in the hallway right outside of the room.  A fight ensued.  All hell breaks loose, and lives are changed forever.

Tune in to hear the rest of the shocking details.
Follow our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot